banner



980ti Vs 1070 Ti Benchmarks

1070 Ti vs 980 Ti

Price now 498$

Games supported 99%

Price now 490$

Games supported 99%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating 68 79
Value for money 48.93 34.80
Architecture Pascal Maxwell
GPU code proper noun Pascal GP104 GM200
Marketplace segment Desktop Desktop
Release date 2 Nov 2017 (4 years ago) two June 2015 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP) $399 $649
Price now $498 (1.2x MSRP) $490 (0.8x MSRP)

Value for money

To become the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

Technical specs

Full general functioning parameters such as number of shaders, GPU cadre base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and adding speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Annotation that ability consumption of some graphics cards tin well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores 2432 no data
CUDA cores no information 2816
Core clock speed 1607 MHz no information
Boost clock speed 1683 MHz 1075 MHz
Number of transistors 7,200 million viii,000 one thousand thousand
Manufacturing process applied science xvi nm 28 nm
Thermal design ability (TDP) 180 Watt no data
Texture fill rate 255.eight 176 billion/sec
Floating-signal performance 8,186 gflops 6,060 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future figurer configuration or upgrading an existing ane. For desktop video cards it's interface and double-decker (motherboard compatibility), boosted power connectors (ability supply compatibility).

Bus back up no data PCI Limited iii.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm ten.v" (26.vii cm)
Height no information 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Recommended system ability (PSU) no data 600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin no data
SLI options no data +

Retentiveness

Parameters of retention installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and utilize a shared function of organization RAM.

Memory type GDDR5 no information
Maximum RAM amount viii GB no data
Memory bus width 256 Bit 384 Scrap
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 7.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth 256.iii GB/due south 336.5 GB/s
Shared memory - -

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of sure video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the carte itself.

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Multi monitor support no data four displays
HDMI + no data
HDCP no data +
Maximum VGA resolution no data 2048x1536
G-SYNC support + +
Sound input for HDMI no data Internal

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This data volition evidence useful if you lot demand some item technology for your purposes.

GameStream no data +
GeForce ShadowPlay no information +
GPU Boost no data ii.0
GameWorks no data +
VR Ready + no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX 12 (12_1) no data
Shader Model 6.iv half dozen.4
OpenGL 4.half-dozen four.five
OpenCL 1.two no data
Vulkan 1.2.131 1.1.126
CUDA half dozen.1 +

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming criterion performance comparing. Note that overall criterion performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark operation rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, just if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments department, we usually fix bug quickly.

  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Burn Strike Graphics
  • 3DMark 11 Functioning GPU
  • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
  • Passmark
  • GeekBench 5 CUDA
  • GeekBench five OpenCL
  • GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and bones notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using stock-still resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in Jan 2020 and replaced past 3DMark Nighttime Raid.

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features 2 separate tests displaying a fight betwixt a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Burn Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used iv tests based on two scenes, i being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite existence done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded past Fourth dimension Spy.

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, function of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level nine to display a boxing between ii infinite fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, information technology is now superseded past 3DMark Night Raid.

This is probably the well-nigh ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics bill of fare a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, ten, eleven and 12 (the terminal being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more than tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GeForce GTX 980 Ti. Usually measured in megahashes per 2d.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) no data 784 Mh/s
Decred / DCR (Decred) no data 2.four Gh/southward
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) no data 21.57 Mh/s
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) no data 0.seven kh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) no data 461 Sol/southward

Gaming operation

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Detail gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Here are the average frames per 2nd in a large set of popular games beyond different resolutions:

1080p 111 101
1440p 72 49
4K 53 49

1920x1080
Medium Preset

Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 50−55

+four.ane%

45−50

−4.1%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55

+4.1%

45−50

−four.one%

Battlefield 5 l−55

+four.i%

45−50

−4.1%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55

+4.1%

45−l

−4.1%

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55

+iv.1%

45−50

−4.one%

Far Cry 5 114

+133%

45−fifty

−133%

Far Cry New Dawn 107

+118%

45−50

−118%

Forza Horizon 4 50−55

+4.1%

45−50

−4.one%

Hitman 3 50−55

+4.one%

45−50

−4.1%

Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55

+four.1%

45−l

−4.1%

Ruby Dead Redemption two 50−55

+4.ane%

45−50

−4.1%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55

+4.1%

45−50

−iv.one%

Sentinel Dogs: Legion 50−55

+four.1%

45−50

−iv.1%

1920x1080
Loftier Preset

Assassin'south Creed Odyssey fifty−55

+4.ane%

45−l

−four.1%

Assassinator's Creed Valhalla 50−55

+4.ane%

45−50

−four.one%

Battlefield v 50−55

+4.i%

45−fifty

−4.1%

Call of Duty: Mod Warfare 50−55

+34.2%

38

−34.2%

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55

+4.ane%

45−50

−4.one%

Far Weep v 108

+120%

45−50

−120%

Far Cry New Dawn 103

+110%

45−50

−110%

Forza Horizon 4 fifty−55

+4.1%

45−50

−4.one%

Hitman three fifty−55

+4.1%

45−fifty

−four.1%

Horizon Zero Dawn fifty−55

+4.one%

45−50

−4.1%

Metro Exodus 66

+34.vii%

45−fifty

−34.7%

Red Dead Redemption two 50−55

+iv.i%

45−50

−4.1%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 42

+27.3%

33

−27.3%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt l−55

+4.one%

45−50

−iv.ane%

Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55

+4.1%

45−50

−4.1%

1920x1080
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 63

+37%

46

−37%

Assassin'south Creed Valhalla l−55

+four.1%

45−50

−4.1%

Battlefield 5 111

+eighteen.1%

94

−18.one%

Cyberpunk 2077 fifty−55

+4.one%

45−50

−4.1%

Far Cry v 102

+32.5%

77

−32.5%

Far Cry New Dawn 93

+89.8%

45−fifty

−89.8%

Forza Horizon 4 100

+38.9%

72

−38.9%

The Witcher 3: Wild Chase 72

+22%

59

−22%

Watch Dogs: Legion l−55

+four.1%

45−50

−4.1%

2560x1440
Loftier Preset

Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55

−v.nine%

54

+5.9%

Hitman three 50−55

+4.i%

45−50

−4.ane%

Horizon Zilch Dawn l−55

+4.1%

45−fifty

−4.1%

Metro Exodus 40

−22.5%

45−50

+22.five%

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55

+four.1%

45−50

−iv.ane%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 51

+4.1%

45−fifty

−iv.1%

2560x1440
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48

−2.1%

45−50

+2.1%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55

+4.one%

45−50

−iv.1%

Battlefield five 83

+69.4%

45−50

−69.4%

Cyberpunk 2077 fifty−55

+4.i%

45−50

−4.one%

Far Weep 5 75

+53.1%

45−fifty

−53.1%

Far Weep New Dawn 76

+55.ane%

45−50

−55.1%

Forza Horizon iv 81

+65.iii%

45−50

−65.3%

Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55

+iv.i%

45−50

−4.1%

3840x2160
Loftier Preset

Phone call of Duty: Mod Warfare 50−55

+59.iv%

32

−59.iv%

Hitman three 50−55

+four.1%

45−50

−4.1%

Horizon Zero Dawn l−55

+iv.1%

45−50

−iv.one%

Metro Exodus 25

−96%

45−50

+96%

Ruby Dead Redemption 2 50−55

+iv.one%

45−50

−4.1%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 28

+21.vii%

23

−21.7%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47

+6.viii%

44

−6.8%

3840x2160
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27

+50%

18

−50%

Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla 50−55

+4.1%

45−50

−4.1%

Battlefield five 47

+17.v%

forty

−17.5%

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55

+4.i%

45−50

−iv.1%

Far Cry 5 39

+thirty%

30

−30%

Far Cry New Dawn 42

−16.7%

45−50

+16.7%

Forza Horizon 4 55

+31%

42

−31%

Scout Dogs: Legion 50−55

+4.one%

45−50

−four.1%

Advantages and disadvantages


Operation rating 49.31 47.twenty
Novelty 2 November 2017 2 June 2015
Cost $399 $649
Retentivity autobus width 256 384
Retention bandwidth 256.3 336.v
Fleck lithography sixteen nm 28 nm

Technical City couldn't decide between

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

and

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

The differences in functioning seem too pocket-size.


Should you nonetheless have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, enquire them in Comments department, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Practise yous call up we are right or mistaken in our selection? Vote past clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics carte du jour.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Competitors of GeForce GTX 1070 Ti past AMD

The nearest GeForce GTX 1070 Ti's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX Vega 64, which is faster by 1% and higher by 3 positions in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1070 Ti:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 100

Competitors of GeForce GTX 980 Ti by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 980 Ti from AMD is Radeon RX 5600 XT, which is nearly equal in speed and is lower by 1 position in our rating.

Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 980 Ti:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 100

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more than probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you lot can run into the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


849 ratings

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

549 ratings

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question well-nigh this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.


Graphics settings

Screen resolution

FPS

davisamettelly.blogspot.com

Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1070-Ti-vs-GeForce-GTX-980-Ti

0 Response to "980ti Vs 1070 Ti Benchmarks"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel