980ti Vs 1070 Ti Benchmarks
Price now 498$ Games supported 99% Price now 490$ Games supported 99% Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters. Value for money To become the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. Full general functioning parameters such as number of shaders, GPU cadre base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and adding speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Annotation that ability consumption of some graphics cards tin well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future figurer configuration or upgrading an existing ane. For desktop video cards it's interface and double-decker (motherboard compatibility), boosted power connectors (ability supply compatibility). Parameters of retention installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and utilize a shared function of organization RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of sure video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the carte itself. Supported technological solutions. This data volition evidence useful if you lot demand some item technology for your purposes. APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs. Non-gaming criterion performance comparing. Note that overall criterion performance is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined benchmark operation rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, just if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments department, we usually fix bug quickly. Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and bones notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using stock-still resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in Jan 2020 and replaced past 3DMark Nighttime Raid. Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features 2 separate tests displaying a fight betwixt a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Burn Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. 3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used iv tests based on two scenes, i being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite existence done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded past Fourth dimension Spy. Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, function of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level nine to display a boxing between ii infinite fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, information technology is now superseded past 3DMark Night Raid. This is probably the well-nigh ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics bill of fare a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, ten, eleven and 12 (the terminal being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more than tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GeForce GTX 980 Ti. Usually measured in megahashes per 2d. Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Detail gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the average frames per 2nd in a large set of popular games beyond different resolutions: +four.ane% −4.1% +4.1% −four.one% +four.i% −4.1% +4.1% −4.1% +iv.1% −4.one% +133% −133% +118% −118% +4.1% −4.one% +4.one% −4.1% +four.1% −4.1% +4.ane% −4.1% +4.1% −iv.one% +four.1% −iv.1% +4.ane% −four.1% +4.ane% −four.one% +4.i% −4.1% +34.2% −34.2% +4.ane% −4.one% +120% −120% +110% −110% +4.1% −4.one% +4.1% −four.1% +4.one% −4.1% +34.vii% −34.7% +iv.i% −4.1% +27.3% −27.3% +4.one% −iv.ane% +4.1% −4.1% +37% −37% +four.1% −4.1% +eighteen.1% −18.one% +4.one% −4.1% +32.5% −32.5% +89.8% −89.8% +38.9% −38.9% +22% −22% +four.1% −4.1% −v.nine% +5.9% +4.i% −4.ane% +4.1% −4.1% −22.5% +22.five% +four.1% −iv.ane% +4.1% −iv.1% −2.1% +2.1% +4.one% −iv.1% +69.4% −69.4% +4.i% −4.one% +53.1% −53.1% +55.ane% −55.1% +65.iii% −65.3% +iv.i% −4.1% +59.iv% −59.iv% +four.1% −4.1% +iv.1% −iv.one% −96% +96% +iv.one% −4.1% +21.vii% −21.7% +6.viii% −6.8% +50% −50% +4.1% −4.1% +17.v% −17.5% +4.i% −iv.1% +thirty% −30% −16.7% +16.7% +31% −31% +4.one% −four.1% Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti The differences in functioning seem too pocket-size. Should you nonetheless have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, enquire them in Comments department, and we shall answer. Practise yous call up we are right or mistaken in our selection? Vote past clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics carte du jour. The nearest GeForce GTX 1070 Ti's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX Vega 64, which is faster by 1% and higher by 3 positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1070 Ti: We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 980 Ti from AMD is Radeon RX 5600 XT, which is nearly equal in speed and is lower by 1 position in our rating. Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 980 Ti: We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more than probable options to consider. Here you lot can run into the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Here you can ask a question well-nigh this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPS1070 Ti vs 980 Ti
General info
Place in performance rating 68 79 Value for money 48.93 34.80 Architecture Pascal Maxwell GPU code proper noun Pascal GP104 GM200 Marketplace segment Desktop Desktop Release date 2 Nov 2017 (4 years ago) two June 2015 (6 years ago) Launch price (MSRP) $399 $649 Price now $498 (1.2x MSRP) $490 (0.8x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 2432 no data CUDA cores no information 2816 Core clock speed 1607 MHz no information Boost clock speed 1683 MHz 1075 MHz Number of transistors 7,200 million viii,000 one thousand thousand Manufacturing process applied science xvi nm 28 nm Thermal design ability (TDP) 180 Watt no data Texture fill rate 255.eight 176 billion/sec Floating-signal performance 8,186 gflops 6,060 gflops Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus back up no data PCI Limited iii.0 Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16 Length 267 mm ten.v" (26.vii cm) Height no information 4.376" (11.1 cm) Recommended system ability (PSU) no data 600 Watt Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin no data SLI options no data + Retentiveness
Memory type GDDR5 no information Maximum RAM amount viii GB no data Memory bus width 256 Bit 384 Scrap Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 7.0 GB/s Memory bandwidth 256.iii GB/due south 336.5 GB/s Shared memory - - Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 Multi monitor support no data four displays HDMI + no data HDCP no data + Maximum VGA resolution no data 2048x1536 G-SYNC support + + Sound input for HDMI no data Internal Technologies
GameStream no data + GeForce ShadowPlay no information + GPU Boost no data ii.0 GameWorks no data + VR Ready + no data API support
DirectX 12 (12_1) no data Shader Model 6.iv half dozen.4 OpenGL 4.half-dozen four.five OpenCL 1.two no data Vulkan 1.2.131 1.1.126 CUDA half dozen.1 + Benchmark performance
Overall score
Mining hashrates
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) no data 784 Mh/s Decred / DCR (Decred) no data 2.four Gh/southward Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) no data 21.57 Mh/s Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) no data 0.seven kh/s Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) no data 461 Sol/southward Gaming operation
1080p 111 101 1440p 72 49 4K 53 49 1920x1080
Medium Preset
Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 50−55 45−50 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55 45−50 Battlefield 5 l−55 45−50 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 45−l Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 45−50 Far Cry 5 114 45−fifty Far Cry New Dawn 107 45−50 Forza Horizon 4 50−55 45−50 Hitman 3 50−55 45−50 Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55 45−l Ruby Dead Redemption two 50−55 45−50 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55 45−50 Sentinel Dogs: Legion 50−55 45−50 1920x1080
Loftier Preset
Assassin'south Creed Odyssey fifty−55 45−l Assassinator's Creed Valhalla 50−55 45−50 Battlefield v 50−55 45−fifty Call of Duty: Mod Warfare 50−55 38 Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 45−50 Far Weep v 108 45−50 Far Cry New Dawn 103 45−50 Forza Horizon 4 fifty−55 45−50 Hitman three fifty−55 45−fifty Horizon Zero Dawn fifty−55 45−50 Metro Exodus 66 45−fifty Red Dead Redemption two 50−55 45−50 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 42 33 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt l−55 45−50 Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 45−50 1920x1080
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 63 46 Assassin'south Creed Valhalla l−55 45−50 Battlefield 5 111 94 Cyberpunk 2077 fifty−55 45−50 Far Cry v 102 77 Far Cry New Dawn 93 45−fifty Forza Horizon 4 100 72 The Witcher 3: Wild Chase 72 59 Watch Dogs: Legion l−55 45−50 2560x1440
Loftier Preset
Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 54 Hitman three 50−55 45−50 Horizon Zilch Dawn l−55 45−fifty Metro Exodus 40 45−50 Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55 45−50 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 51 45−fifty 2560x1440
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48 45−50 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55 45−50 Battlefield five 83 45−50 Cyberpunk 2077 fifty−55 45−50 Far Weep 5 75 45−fifty Far Weep New Dawn 76 45−50 Forza Horizon iv 81 45−50 Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 45−50 3840x2160
Loftier Preset
Phone call of Duty: Mod Warfare 50−55 32 Hitman three 50−55 45−50 Horizon Zero Dawn l−55 45−50 Metro Exodus 25 45−50 Ruby Dead Redemption 2 50−55 45−50 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 28 23 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47 44 3840x2160
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27 18 Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla 50−55 45−50 Battlefield five 47 forty Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 45−50 Far Cry 5 39 30 Far Cry New Dawn 42 45−50 Forza Horizon 4 55 42 Scout Dogs: Legion 50−55 45−50 Advantages and disadvantages
Operation rating 49.31 47.twenty Novelty 2 November 2017 2 June 2015 Cost $399 $649 Retentivity autobus width 256 384 Retention bandwidth 256.3 336.v Fleck lithography sixteen nm 28 nm
Cast your vote
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1070 Ti past AMD
Competitors of GeForce GTX 980 Ti by AMD
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1070-Ti-vs-GeForce-GTX-980-Ti
0 Response to "980ti Vs 1070 Ti Benchmarks"
Post a Comment